Table 6

Continuous Performance Test: effect sizes
Study BD group Control group Effect size
Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
Ancin et al. (2010) N = 141 N = 101
  False alarm rate, block 3 10.6 (12.3) 8.6 (11.6) 0.167
  Response criterion, block 3 0.65 (0.72) 0.53 (0.87) 0.15
Brooks et al. (2010) N = 16 N = 11
  Commission errors 15.5 (7.9) 10.5 (5.5) 0.68
Fleck et al. (2005) N = 23 N = 28
  Response criterion 0.49 (0.22) 0.52 (0.20) -0.14
Iosifescu et al. (2009) N = 20 N = 10
  Commission errors 12.41 (4.82) 7.50 (4.93) 1.01
Kolur et al. (2006) N = 30 N = 30
  Commission error 21.40 (29.91) 12.73 (7.15) 0.47
Malloy-Diniz et al. (2011) N = 95 N = 94
  Commission errors 16.17 (8.76) 10.26 (7.2) 0.74
Martino et al. (2008) N = 20 N = 20
  False alarm rate 6.7 (6.1) 4.0 (3.4) 0.57
Strakowski et al. (2010) N = 31 N = 35
  Response criterion 0.69 (0.28) 0.67 (0.30) 0.07
Swann et al. (2003) N = 25 N = 35
  DMT commission errors 21.1 (18.8) 17.9 (15.5) 0.19
Swann et al. (2004) N = 37 N = 16
  DMT commission errors 13.6 (9.0) 18.4 (15.6) -0.44
Thompson et al. (2009) N = 63 N = 63
  Commission errors 2.61 (3.10) 1.73 (2.23) 0.33

Newman and Meyer

Newman and Meyer International Journal of Bipolar Disorders 2014 2:2   doi:10.1186/2194-7511-2-2

Open Data